Looking at the allegations on Paramahamsa Nithyananda: A Perspective study

Recently a month back, the sex-scandal allegations with a sample video clipping been aired in a private television channel in tamilnadu about Pramahamsa Nithyananda. I too got a chance to watch that clipping through youtube online as i do not have a cable connection in my home.

Here, in this post, i wanted to share my perception about the news and the happenings post airing. Since many people are writing blogs spreading negative news about the masters and other people, i thought, what if i write one to spread the incense smell amidst of the gushing and stinking smoke.. Ofcourse, the incense will be an incense, even if somebody's nostrils are blocked or defective.

As a independent and democratic human being, with bit of intelligence i would like to approach at this news about Paramahamsa Nithyananda and the common ideas that prevails among the human minds about this news.

1) Since some people have power and also have media in their hands, they air many things everyday. These days, major media channels (not all) wanted to use it to portray some as good and some as bad (based on their political + personal + commercial needs) and after a period of time, praise them and abuse others by portraying them wrongly. Those are common these days and nobody can deny that.

2) I am thinking why the responsible indian media channels airs some news or video clippings without knowing the source of it or even if it knows the source, without knowing the authenticity of the news. Thus i am haunted by a question, 'whether many of the indian private/satellite channels are really trying to communicate the real happenings to common people or wanted to use their viewer's emotions and mind against somebody whom they are not comfortable with.

3) Airing such news through mass media without knowing its authenticity could create a lot of emotions among a set of public and there by they can use that emotions against anybody they consider as a personal or political enemy.

4) I see, primarily there are three set of emotions happened among various people after the allegations on Paramahamsa Nithyananda.

• One set of people lost their temper without keeping their patience in analyzing what could be true and started indulging in the vandalistic activities.
• Other set started spreading rumors that this is the reason why we should not run behind the enlightened masters.
• Other limited set of people patiently questioned within themself in an un-biased way about the authenticity of the tape. Also, they raised a question within themself if the news is true as shown in the airing, what could be the real motive behind doing such activities or can a enlightened master indulge in such activities if so, why we accepted krishna as a enlightened avatar when the history clearly shows that he has got married to 16000 wifes etc.
  

All these three set of people are not devotee or disciples of Nithyananda or in long-term association with him but these are the common people who has developed different set of emotions at their heart after this incident. There are few disciples of him who also did not understand the truth and failed to use their intelligence. They quit him as if they have lost their intelligent thinking when they were associated with him which is truly sad.

5) One thing i found is, the life bliss foundation or Dhyanapeetam has aired many video clipping through youtube (1000+) with talks by master on yoga, shiva sutra, bhagavad gita, the meditations, healing, positive energy etc.. I have never seen any video clipping aired by them portraying wrongly about anybody personally. This lead me to question now, 'why many of local media that did not air those moralistic talks by master to make the public to lead a happier life suddenly started only airing some video clip that too with its questionable authenticity'.

If all the indian media channels really concerned only about the welfare of the society and its people, they should have aired only the allowable life-affirmative contents and not the negative news about a person until it is proven as true by law and order.

I could clearly see that the indian media shows its upper hands on its people and on the law and order also. Atleast in the case of nithyananda video clip, the television channels have overridden the law and order and have taken the authority on its own.

Almost every common guy knows that the majority of the indian politicians and ministers in rule has a notorious record of corruption and criminal charges against them. I could even say that 1 in every 2 ministers of state or central has atleast one recorded charges against him. But everyone of them has been given a chance for the bail or even release from the case and still he is doing his duties in assembly..

But even after the CID's interrogation fails to prove the allegation on master, why should the judiciary or law and order still keep him in judicial custody without giving him even the bail. If asked, they say that if nithyananda is given bail, he could tamper the records related to the case which will further complicate their chance of proving him as guilty.

A simple analytical calculation of last 8 years of public life on Nithyananda vs many of the history of the politicians in india would shed more light on the impartial approach on him by the law and order and indian judiciary.

Any common man who see these things could easily understand when such cases or even worst charges are there against the political or power people, they are given bail the next day and why not for Paramahamsa Nithyananda?

This raises a question to me whether the Indian Judicial system or IPC has any discrimination in their IPC codes between the power people, common people and enlightened masters. If so, how come the common IPC sections cases filed by the people on Paramahamasa nithyananda is taken into account for interrogation? If not that way and indian judicial system is impartial in its laws on different people, how does many of the indian political criminals could easily escape the law and judicial system with bail. Does that mean, the law and judicial system is deaf or dumb for some and strict on some or works based on bribery?

Post airing incidents (each news on Paramahams Nithyananda) clearly raises many questions to me why the law and order, common people, indian judiciary is completely partial in judging an enlightened master and not giving him a fair chance to prove his innocense.

I have heard sometime back that, one of the tamil news channel set up cameras in the place of a famous political leader in tamilnadu and portrayed his innocence during his arrest in his house by the ruling party leader. Some said that they used the media channel in their hand at that time to create an idea among people to view him as innocent and view the ruling party leader as autocrat to successfully win the vote banks for the successive elections.

Do Paramahamsa Nithyananda should similarly set the camera whereever he goes and capture the video with the dates to prove his innocense. In the policitical leader's case, they have known the arrest of him beforehand and did the arrangements but in master's case, nobody expected such allegations will be done one after the other.

Again, this blog contents is not to pin point the inefficiency of somebody or some system or indian law and order or indian judiciary. This is to throw some lights for the people to approach the news with bit of intelligence and not to completely follow and beleive in the news or media's wrong news.